Microsoft for Education vs. Google for Education: Which One is Best for Your School?

Introduction

Adoption of cloud technologies in schools has become standard practice, with schools migrating more and more of their digital assets, learning resources and school administration to the cloud.

Two technology giants, Microsoft and Google, offer comprehensive suites of tools designed to facilitate learning, collaboration, and administration in the cloud.

For school administrators, choosing between Microsoft for Education and Google for Education is an important choice that will shape the school’s digital ecosystem for years. This article delves into the pros and cons of each platform, aiming to provide a clearer picture for schools who are weighting up choice.

 

Microsoft for Education

Microsoft for Education provides an array of solutions aimed at enhancing the educational experience. This suite includes Office 365 Education, Microsoft Teams, OneNote, and Minecraft: Education Edition, among others. These tools are designed to integrate with existing educational infrastructure, facilitating collaboration, creativity, and efficient classroom management. Microsoft emphasises security and accessibility within its educational offerings and the platform is tailored to support educators in delivering curriculum content, while also equipping students with necessary digital skills.

Pros:
  • Integration with Legacy Systems: Microsoft’s offerings integrate seamlessly with existing Windows-based infrastructure, making it an attractive option for schools already entrenched in Microsoft’s ecosystem.
  • Comprehensive Toolset: Microsoft for Education provides a robust suite of tools including Office 365, Teams for collaboration, OneNote for note-taking, and specialized learning tools that cater to a variety of learning needs and styles.
  • Advanced Features: For schools requiring advanced IT infrastructure and capabilities, Microsoft’s platform offers superior control, security features, and compliance standards, making it ideal for larger institutions or those with specific regulatory requirements.
Cons:
  • Complexity and Cost: The breadth of features and customization options can translate into a steeper learning curve for educators and students alike. Additionally, while basic educational tools are free, more advanced features and integrations may come with substantial costs.
  • Hardware Requirements: Optimal performance of Microsoft’s suite often requires more powerful hardware, which might necessitate additional investment for schools needing to upgrade their devices.
Google for Education

Google for Education offers a set of cloud-based tools intended to modernise the educational environment. Central to its offerings are Google Classroom, Docs, Sheets, and Slides, which promote real-time collaboration and learning. Google aims to simplify the use of technology in education through these tools, making it more accessible and engaging for students and teachers alike. The focus is on providing a flexible and secure learning platform that supports interactive and inclusive educational experiences.

Pros:
  • User-Friendly Interface: Known for its simplicity and ease of use, Google for Education facilitates a smooth transition for schools new to digital education. Tools like Google Classroom, Docs, Sheets, and Slides are intuitive and require minimal training.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Google for Education offers a competitive suite of tools that are free or low-cost, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious schools. This includes cloud storage solutions which can lead to savings on IT infrastructure.
  • Collaboration and Accessibility: Real-time collaboration is at the heart of Google’s offering, promoting a more interactive and accessible learning environment. Additionally, Google’s tools are easily accessible from a variety of devices and operating systems, ensuring equitable access.
Cons:
  • Privacy Concerns: In the past, Google has faced scrutiny over data privacy and the handling of student information. While Google state that “Google Workspace for Education Core Services don’t collect or use information for advertising purposes” there have been questions raised as to how closely the platform conforms to GDPR rules.
  • Limited Offline Functionality: While Google for Education is highly effective online, its offline capabilities are limited compared to Microsoft’s suite, which could be a drawback in areas with poor internet connectivity.
Things to Consider

When deciding between Microsoft for Education and Google for Education, schools should consider several key factors:

Existing Infrastructure: Schools should assess their current IT infrastructure and determine which platform aligns best with their existing investments and resources.
Budget Constraints: The cost of implementation, including potential hardware upgrades and subscription fees, should be carefully weighed against the school’s budget.

Educational Needs and Goals: It’s important to consider which platform better supports the school’s pedagogical approaches and learning objectives.

Training and Support: The availability of training resources and support from the system integrator can significantly impact the success of technology adoption in educational settings. P8i offer ongoing, comprehensive support and training for both Google and Microsoft for Education.

Conclusion

Both Microsoft for Education and Google for Education offer compelling benefits for schools looking to enhance their digital learning environments. The choice between them should be informed by an assessment of each school’s specific needs, and weighting up elements such as ease of use, budget, and ease of integration with existing infrastructure.  We hope the pros and cons outlined above can help you make an informed decision that best supports your school’s needs.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed on the latest EdTech, insights, training and tips: